I am sure that in a few weeksâ€™ time some of us will look back on the Olympics and feel a bit sad about being able to say â€œthis was the time of our livesâ€. However the reality is that for a very large number of people this phrase sums up their personal experience of the event.
I am too young to remember the Festival of Britain but my parentâ€™s generation, having survived the war and started to live fuller and slightly better off lives, often used that experience to highlight how differently they felt about their country and their lives in 1951.
A few years later the Coronation provided a similar moment in some parts of the country. But like this yearâ€™s Jubilee what was different about the Olympics is that we were – all of us – given the opportunity, and indeed the right, to celebrate not only the monarchy but the whole country.
I, along with a few hundred thousand other people, was doubly lucky.
First for having spent most of my life living in London and, from a very early age, having had strong emotional ties to the city – especially to the East End. I was born and brought up in South East London but for most of my life the East End has been the place I have walked around, occasionally had political battles over and of late enjoyed its surprising regeneration. I have often walked the Lea Valley and did not believe that anything would ever be big enough to fill the vast economic and physical hole that clearly needed regeneration.
Turning millions of tons of contaminated turf into a beautiful place with wild flowers was beyond even my optimistic list of probabilities.
Second I was lucky enough to win the opportunity to buy a set of tickets in the ballot which gave me a day at the athletics in the morning and at the basketball in the evening. So I spent a whole day in the Olympic Park and that is where I saw so many people having the time of their lives.
Much of the positive experience was about us, as individuals, linking up with us as a part of a country of which we could feel proud. Thatâ€™s my historical link with the Festival of Britain. My parents were a part of a generation that had not only survived and beaten fascism, but were rebuilding their lives and the lives of the country in a new world.
Most of the last 60 years hasnâ€™t felt like that. Many of the events that the country has celebrated havenâ€™t been those in which I could really find much that resonated with me. But Danny Boyleâ€™s opening ceremony not only celebrated the country as something external to me, but effortlessly placed me and my life within both the country and that celebration. The NHS, the rise of a new multicultural society, rock music, new culture and a better approach to the different ways in which we live our lives â€“ all presented a different view of us as a country.
And when as a country we went on to win medals in both the Paralympics and the Olympics, it was this country of which I could celebrate being a part. That was the â€˜time of my lifeâ€™ because my life and my time felt part of something much larger – the nation as a whole.
I have two wider lessons for an NHS that was so wonderfully celebrated in the opening ceremony. The first I will discuss today and the second next Friday.
I am not alone in learning my first big lesson from the Olympic volunteers, the games makers. I know two people who were successful in being selected as volunteers and in the strangest of coincidences they were both born in Mombasa, Kenya. They both came to this country as a part of the exodus of East African Asians over 40 years ago. Both were very happy to give of themselves and their time in a celebration of internationalism in their adopted city of the past 40 years.
But it was a wider experience of the way in which the volunteers behaved that provided me with a lesson. My own experience and everyone elseâ€™s I have talked to saw and felt that these volunteers behaved entirely differently from nearly all the other volunteers we had met. In the NHS and other major institutions volunteers seem to sit on the sidelines and let everyone else get on with the main activities.
In hospitals for example it is the paid staff that run the whole experience and the volunteers sit behind a desk or make tea but they donâ€™t push themselves into the patient experience.
At the Olympics volunteers enriched everyoneâ€™s experience of the games by being very outgoing – asking you how you were and if you were excited. They did this as a way of performing their task of getting hundreds of thousands of people from A to B. But they also made sure you were OK.
They knew they were central to the experience and they made sure we all had a good time.
How can we make volunteering in health and health care like this?
I am sure there will be some who will immediately say that volunteers simply canâ€™t be as important in a complex, professionally led and safety conscious activity such as health care Â Â Volunteers can never be this important when doctors, nurses, and indeed science, are so important to the NHS.
But think about the Olympics for a minute. The volunteers were very important and everyone agreed that they were essential. But no one suggested that they could run as fast as Usain Bolt or finish the marathon David Weirâ€™s pace. The volunteers â€˜madeâ€™ the games – but of course there were other specialist skills that were just as important.
Volunteers created the environment in which spectators could enjoy the hard work of the specialists.
Volunteers could make an environment in which patients have a much better experience of the NHS whilst still depending on the hard work of the specialists.
But for this to work NHS volunteers will need to be as active and outgoing as the Olympic volunteers. It was their activity rather than passivity that made them so exceptional.
Given the shift we are going to have to make in NHS care – away from the notion that health care only takes place in hospitals and clinics Â when in fact it takes place in homes and communities – now is the time to rework our perception of the importance of volunteers in becoming health care â€˜makersâ€™.