9
Oct

Interesting post from Catherine Dhanjal on the lists this afternoon announcing their intentions.

From other correspondence received it seems clear that the “rough wooing” of existing D Tech clients has begun in earnest with Newcastle now being singled out already as a key Bibliotheca site.

How this pans out in contractual and support terms is, of course, entirely a matter for the parties involved and hopefully solutions that suit client’s needs will be paramount in everyone’s mind as the story develops.

From my own perspective – and increasingly from the point of view of all those who seek to create more co-operative service models in the future there are still one or two slight concerns niggling at the back of my mind.

Last week I was delighted to report that progress toward the publication of ISO 28560 in all three parts was proceeding as rapidly as could be expected. The creation of a common foundation for RFID development is in my opinion, as regular readers will know, key for both library co-operation and future service development so anything that might prevent us from achieving that goal makes me nervous.

I wrote to Matthias Joos expressing my concern that Bibliotheca’s web pages gave strong endorsement to ISO 28560-3 with no mention of the UK’s preferred option of 28560-2 and he was quick to reassure me that Bibliotheca intend to support both versions.

He also used the opportunity to promote the same “dual data model” self-service kiosk that I have already criticised on these pages (when D Tech took me to task for doing so!).

This is the kiosk that can convert data models “on the fly”. The claim is made that by using it you can convert all your stock in 3-4 months.

My question previously ”how do you manage the stock that isn’t circulated in this period?”  wasn’t answered then either. From the responses I’ve had to the question I asked earlier in the week it seems that only a small percentage of stock would have been circulated in 3-4 months, leaving a huge amount unconverted.

Since self-service is only one aspect of RFID stock management how does a library identify which items on the shelf have which model? The answer that most UK RFID suppliers seem to have reached is to enable all their devices to read two models. Hopefully that will be Bibliotheca’s conclusion as well.

This is a minor concern though. The phrase that worries me in the press release is “… supplying customer-specific state-of the art RFID solutions” (my emphasis). I’m sure it’s more a question of ”lost in translation” rather than indicating a return to a proprietary approach but I really hope it doesn’t mean that libraries will be encouraged to operate outside of the new standard.

Those concerns aside it is of course good news for UK libraries that another major player has arrived – and just in time for the November conference too! I’m really looking forward to meeting them there!

Category : Bibliotheca / D Tech / Standards

2 Responses to “Bibliotheca and D Tech – battle lines being drawn?”


Matthias Joos October 26, 2009

Dear RFID users,

I wanted to leave a little correction about how I was referred above.

Bibliotheca is committed to the standards since from day 1! But not all countries worldwide do apply the same standard. Therefore we follow the applicable countries up to date standard.

Sould the standard change, we do have multiple methods covering such a situation for all customers. One of it being the conversion on the fly during normal circultion.

Even after 3..4 month, the converted datamodel and the old datamodel(s) can be read, as Bibliotheca can read multiple, items, multiple chips and multiple datamodels at the same time in a stack mode.

Should you require more information, you are welcome to talk to Bibliotheca (and myself) at the RFID conference in November in London.

best regards

Matthias Joos
CEO Bibliotheca

admin October 26, 2009

Thanks for that Matthias. I think perhaps some of my meaning may have been ambiguous since I was not questioning the ability of Bibliotheca’s products to continue to read dual (or multiple) tag formats beyond 3-4 months. Neither am I questioning the ability of your circualtion stations to read multiple formats.

My interest lies in how a library manages stock in areas OTHER than circulation with multiple tag formats and over a longer period of time. It’s the debate that is currently taking place in areas as diverse as Walmart’s supply chain and the Internet of Things. How can we deliver the future without some degree of conformity? There are any number of studies on close vs open loop RFID systems that identify the lack of common standards as the greatest single obstacle to progress with RFID. A common standard gives us an opportunity to correct that in libraries at least. So surely at some point it makes sense to convert all stock to a single tag format?

It’s a point that will no doubt be discussed at the RFID conference on Nov 10th so perhaps we should wait for that opportunity?